A confession of murder: the psychiatrist's dilemma.
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Countering countertransference: a forensic trainee's dilemma.
Forensic psychiatry involves an adaptation to a role that is very different from the psychiatrist's previous clinical experiences. To render an unbiased forensic opinion, psychiatrists have to rise above their countertransference feelings. This takes years of practice and experience. The following is an account of a forensic trainee who faced several countertransference problems as he evaluated...
متن کاملHarmless error analysis: How do judges respond to confession errors?
In Arizona v. Fulminante (1991), the U.S. Supreme Court opened the door for appellate judges to conduct a harmless error analysis of erroneously admitted, coerced confessions. In this study, 132 judges from three states read a murder case summary, evaluated the defendant's guilt, assessed the voluntariness of his confession, and responded to implicit and explicit measures of harmless error. Res...
متن کاملReducing murder to manslaughter: whose job?
This paper compares two versions of the diminished responsibility defence, which reduces murder to manslaughter: the present statutory formulation and a proposed reformulation. The comparison confirms that evidence such as psychiatrists are commonly invited to give in murder cases takes them beyond their proper role. Paradoxically, although the two formulations mean essentially the same thing, ...
متن کاملThe Influence of Race on Eyewitness Memory
One Sunday morning in May of 2000, a 15-year-old Black youth named Brenton Butler was walking to a video store to apply for a job when he was picked up by police as a possible suspect in a brutal murder that had occurred earlier that morning. Taken back to the motel where the murder had taken place, Butler was positively identified by the murder victim’s husband, James Stevens, who had observed...
متن کاملتعدد اقرار در جرایم علیه عفت عمومی
Detection of the truth has been ever one of the important concerns of scientists in the sciences related to judicial issues. In penal problems, to detect the truth, the evidences are resorted which are referred to as proof evidences. These evidences or in other word their queen is confession. The confession as the queen of evidences has special position in Islamic judicial context. In penal l...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Loyola of Los Angeles law review
دوره 29 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1996